Monday, July 20, 2009

Sleeping Bags--Synthetic, types, pros and cons

If you plan to risk wet gear on a canoe trip or rainy climate, or if you are on a budget, then synthetic sleeping bags should be a consideration.

Pros:
  • Even while wet, synthetics retain up to 70% of body heat

  • Less expensive than down. $100 will purchase a good all-around bag. $150 will purchase an excellent, long lasting sleeping bag

  • Storing these bags loosely, not in the stuff bags, they can last for many years without breaking down.
Cons:
  • Heavier than down. Your synthetic bag may weigh double what a down bag would weigh. For example, a down may weigh 3 lbs, where a comparable synthetic bag may weigh 5-6 lbs.

  • Bulkier than down. In a camper, this may not be a consideration, but if you are backpacking or trying to fit everything in a small trunk, be aware of the difference in space. Down will compress at least 25% more.

Fills

  • Hollofill: Inexpensive, for warm weather summer camping.

  • Thinsulate: Not made for the dryer, usually found in shirts, jackets or boots, very warm.

  • Polarguard: HV is durable but has low compression. 3D (newer) Warmer, more down-like soft, more durable than most synthetics.

  • Quallofil: Short polyester fibers with seven chambers. Lighter and more compressible than most, but doesn't hold it's loft as well as newer materials.

  • Primaloft: Down-like fiber, blending variaous diameters of polyester fibers. Water resistant and insulates well when wet. Very impressive.

  • Micro-loft: Down-like fiber, lighweight, warm and supple. Keeps its loft and warmth even when wet. Very impressive.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Your comments and feedback are welcome. Please feel free to share after you register.